Blistering Opinion : Satterberg : Federal Judges : 5
The Ferdeal Judges are more than correct as I am a witness, have the evidence, video taped, tracked this whole King County Corrupt Court game that is being played-out.
See http://hardtruth.us for proof.
I, s-u-p-p-o-s-e, if one has no ethics, then technically there is no violation of ethics.
Prosecutor Dan Satterberg has stated his “ministers of justice” have a higher standard bar to meet. Guess that standard is sooo very high that no one can see where the bar hangs.
Prosecutor Dan Satterberg and Judge Susan Graighead appear to do as Dionysius the Tyrant did. The Tyrant hung his laws so high that no citizen could read them. Naturally one wonders if their (Dan Satterberg & Susan Graighead) ethics are hung anywhere, at any location, on anything to be found.
Alongside the Enumclaw hate crime, endorsed and protected by Prosecutor Dan Satterberg, note well Mr. Satterberg’s method is to deny any evidence then not find any evidence. Guess setups work both ways.
Little wonder there is so much corruption in the King County Courts that Judge Susan Graighead channels her way as Prosecutor Dan Satterberg is certainly not going to find any evidence because they would have to condemn each other.
Warning: If you, as a private citizen, did what King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg of Washington State does, with the help of Judge Susan Craighead, it would be criminal not a mere “ethics” violation. Rest assured, King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg, and his corrupting of lawfulness, prosecutors, will, one day, indeed, answer to a higher bar for the rot they promoted.
Jesus answered, You would have no power over me if it were not given to you from above. Therefore the one who handed me over to you is guilty of a greater sin. (John 19:11)
( see www.hardtruth.us for details)
In a separate, though a-typical pattern by Prosecuting Attorney Dan Satterberg and King County Prosecutors were given a “blistering opinion” by 5 Federal Judges.
Prosecutor Mark Larson, Prosecutor Rich Anderson, Prosecutor Jason Simmons, Prosecutor Lisa Johnson, with Judge Lori K. Smith protecting the corruption provided by the Enumclaw Police. Most notably Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall.
We saw this pattern, and many others, again and again by King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg’s office.
Typical of Seattle’s King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg, deny anything wrong, then go look into the matter. Set-ups work both ways with King County Culture of Court Corruption.
In a blistering opinion, five federal appeals court judges accused two King County prosecutors of conspiring to hide evidence and allowing a witness to make false statements on the stand.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to offer any relief to Joshua Frost, who was sentenced to 55 years for his part in a string of robberies in 2003. But Judge Alex Kozinski and four others said in an opinion released this week that the prosecutors’ actions were “troubling” and needed to be revealed.
The King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office violated a rule requiring the disclosure of information material to the case “by willfully withholding evidence of Shaw’s domestic-violence plea deal and permitting Shaw to lie on the stand,” Kozinski said….
Erik Blevin, Frost’s lawyer on the latest appeal, said Kozinski has been outspoken about prosecutorial misconduct and often uses strong language because he believes no one is addressing the problem.
“He’s using the disinfecting effect of sunlight,” Blevin said.
After Frost’s conviction he filed an appeal, and his case reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which sent it back to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
At issue was whether Frost’s lawyer should have been allowed to argue that the prosecution failed to prove Frost was an accomplice and that Frost acted under duress. The Supreme Court found the court’s refusal to let the lawyer make both arguments was harmless because Frost had confessed.
The high court sent the case back to the 9th Circuit to decide whether Frost’s claims that the prosecutors violated his rights were prejudicial. In a 6-5 decision, the appeals court said Frost didn’t show prejudice because Frost had confessed and other evidence linked him to the crimes. But five of those six judges, led by Kozinski, scolded prosecutors.
At trial, prosecutor Zachary Wagnild introduced an unsigned plea agreement for an unlawful possession charge against Shaw. The signed copy referenced a separate plea deal for Shaw on a domestic-violence charge, but it was never mentioned during Shaw’s testimony. The prosecutor who handled Shaw’s case, Gary Ernsdorff, filed the domestic-violence plea agreement two days after Frost was convicted.
“The sequence of events raises the inference that Ernsdorff collaborated with Wagnild to conceal the agreement from Frost until Wagnild had secured a guilty verdict,” Kozinski said. “If so, this would be shameful misconduct on the part of both prosecuting attorneys.”
Wagnild, who is now a private defense lawyer, denied he intentionally withheld evidence.
“As an attorney who has spent the last five years representing individuals accused of crimes, I applaud Judge Kozinski and the 9th Circuit’s efforts to ensure that the rights of the accused are zealously guarded,” he said in an email. “As a prosecutor it was always my goal to provide criminal defendants with all of evidence that could in any way be conceived to be exculpatory or otherwise helpful to the defense.”